Skip to content
World Egg Organisation
  • Become a Member
  • Login
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Vision, Mission & Values
    • Our History
    • WEO Leadership
    • WEO Family Tree 
    • Member Directory 
    • WEO Support Group
  • Our Work
    • HPAI Support Hub
    • Vision 365
    • World Egg Day
    • Young Egg Leaders
    • WEO Awards
    • Industry Representation
    • Egg Nutrition
    • Egg Sustainability
  • Our Events
    • Tackling Avian Flu Together: Side Event at WHA78
    • WEO Global Leadership Conference Cartagena 2025
    • Future WEO Events
    • Previous WEO Events
    • Other Industry Events
  • Resources
    • News Updates
    • Presentations 
    • Country Insights 
    • Cracking Egg Nutrition
    • Downloadable Resources
    • Chick Placements 
    • Interactive Statistics 
    • Publications 
    • Scientific Library 
    • Industry Guidelines, Positions, and Responses 
  • Contact
  • Become a Member
  • Login
Home > Resources > Scientific Library > Egg Production > Housing > Housing Systems > Abrahamsson, 1998 – Performance and Egg Quality of Laying Hens in an Aviary System
  • Resources
  • News Updates
  • Presentations 
  • Country Insights 
  • Interactive Statistics 
  • Chick Placements 
  • Downloadable Resources
  • Cracking Egg Nutrition
  • WEO Publications 
  • Scientific Library 
  • Industry Guidelines, Positions, and Responses 

Abrahamsson, 1998 – Performance and Egg Quality of Laying Hens in an Aviary System

Laying Hens were kept in an aviary system on a practical scale under Swedish conditions during five entire production cycles. All hens were non beak-trimmed, since this is prohibited in Sweden. The aviary type used, Marielund, is a three-tiered aviary with litter. About 4700 hens kept in four pens were housed in each batch. Lohmann Selected Leghorn (LSL) layers were used in all five trials. In addition to LSL, the Lohmann Brown (LB) was used in Trial 3 and an experimental cross (SLU-1329) was used in Trail 5. The performance of the hens from 20 until 80 wk (18.6 to 22.5 kg/hen housed), as well as mortality (4.0 to 20.9%), varied between years. This variation was greater than could be expected in cage systems and was possibly the result of unpredictable cases of canibalism, in the medium heavy brown hybrid especially, and/or parasitic disorders like Red mites or coccidiosis. The proportion of misplaced eggs (floor eggs) seemed to be influenced by rearing, but was also observed to vary between different pens within batch. The total range during the five trials was between 0.7 and 18.4%. The proportion of dirty eggs was highly dependent on the proportion of misplaced eggs.

Download Now

Stay Updated

Want to gain the latest news from the WEO and updates on our events? Sign up to the WEO Newsletter.

    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Become a Member
    • Contact
    • Careers

UK Administration Office

P: +44 (0) 1694 723 004

E: info@worldeggorganisation.com

  • Linkedin
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • X
  • YouTube
Site by web and creative agencyeighteen73

Search

Select A Language