Skip to content
World Egg Organisation
  • Become a Member
  • Login
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Vision, Mission & Values
    • Our History
    • WEO Leadership
    • WEO Family Tree 
    • Member Directory 
    • WEO Support Group
  • Our Work
    • HPAI Support Hub
    • Vision 365
    • World Egg Day
    • Young Egg Leaders
    • WEO Awards
    • Industry Representation
    • Egg Nutrition
    • Egg Sustainability
  • Our Events
    • WEO Global Leadership Conference Cartagena 2025
    • Future WEO Events
    • Previous WEO Events
    • Other Industry Events
  • Resources
    • News Updates
    • Presentations 
    • Country Insights 
    • Cracking Egg Nutrition
    • Downloadable Resources
    • Chick Placements 
    • Interactive Statistics 
    • Publications 
    • Scientific Library 
    • Industry Guidelines, Positions, and Responses 
  • Contact
  • Become a Member
  • Login
Home > Resources > Scientific Library > Egg Production > Avian Health > Moulting > Dickey, 2012 – Effects of a premolt calcium and low-energy molt program on laying hen performance, egg quality, and economics
  • Resources
  • News Updates
  • Presentations 
  • Country Insights 
  • Interactive Statistics 
  • Chick Placements 
  • Downloadable Resources
  • Cracking Egg Nutrition
  • WEO Publications 
  • Scientific Library 
  • Industry Guidelines, Positions, and Responses 

Dickey, 2012 – Effects of a premolt calcium and low-energy molt program on laying hen performance, egg quality, and economics

The objectives of this study were to evaluate and compare the effects of production, physiology, egg quality, and economics of laying hens housed in a cage system when offered a calcium premolt treatment and low-energy molt diets versus a traditional feed withdrawal (FW) treatment during and after molt. In total, 981 Hy-Line W-36 laying hens (85 wk of age) housed 3 per cage were used. Six treatments were compared in a 2 × 3 factorial design with 2 calcium premolt treatments (fine and coarse) and 3 molt diets (FW, soybean hulls, and wheat middlings). The coarse Ca was a 50:50 mix of fine (0.14-mm mean diameter) and coarse (2.27-mm mean diameter) CaCO3, whereas the fine Ca was an all-fine CaCO3. Both diets were formulated to contain 4.6% Ca, such that only the particle size of the CaCO3 differed. Production parameters in experiment 1 included egg production, egg weight and mass, specific gravity, Haugh units, egg components, feed consumption and utilization, and BW. Physiological parameters in experiment 2 included ovary and oviduct weights, femur- and humerus-ash percentages, heterophil to lymphocyte ratios, plasma Ca and inorganic P concentrations, and alkaline phosphatase activity. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and P < 0.05 was significant. The fine-Ca premolt treatment was more effective than the coarse-Ca treatment at decreasing egg production during molt and increasing it postmolt, regardless of the molt diet. The FW molt diet resulted in the greatest decrease in production, but the soybean hulls diet resulted in lower production and ovary and oviduct weights during molt compared with those of the wheat middlings molt diet. Therefore, a fine-Ca premolt treatment and a low-energy molt diet, particularly soybean hulls, can be useful alternatives to a FW molt.

Download Now

Stay Updated

Want to gain the latest news from the WEO and updates on our events? Sign up to the WEO Newsletter.

    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Become a Member
    • Contact
    • Careers

UK Administration Office

P: +44 (0) 1694 723 004

E: info@worldeggorganisation.com

  • Linkedin
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • X
  • YouTube
Site by web and creative agencyeighteen73

Search

Select A Language